Legal Opinion
Concorde Resources Corp. v. Kepco Energy, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 23, 2011No. 107,129. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH RAPP, Judge.
1 1 The plaintiff, Concorde Resources Corporation (Concorde), appeals an order granting summary judgment to the defendants, Kepco Energy, Inc. (Kepeo), Williams Production Mid-Continent Company (Williams), and Mahalo Energy (USA), Inc. (Mahalo), and to the defendants, Pyle, Carey & Collie, Ine. (PCC), Smith, Smith and Smith, a general partnership (Smith) and Naney Jackson Dawson (Dawson). 1 This appeal proceeds under the provisions of Okla. Sup.Ct. Rule 1.86, 12 0.8. Supp.2010, ch. 15, app. 1.
BACKGROUND
12 PCC, Smith and Dawson, or their predecessors, had previously leased…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Fent v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- KRIMBILL v. TALARICOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- Optima Oil & Gas Co. v. Mewbourne Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012