Legal Opinion
Community Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2001No. B136115PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
Introduction
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles (CRA) and the County of Los Angeles (County) dispute the manner in which property tax revenue is shared. The dispute centers on County’s interpretation of Revenue and Taxation Code section 95.3 (section 95.3), which reduces the amount of revenue that CRA receives. We uphold County’s interpretation and affirm.
Background
California law authorizes the creation of community redevelopment agencies to rehabilitate blighted areas. These agencies adopt plans for specific blighted areas, and pursuant to these plans…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates v. Van De KampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Arcadia Redevelopment Agency v. IkemotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Montessori Schoolhouse of Orange County, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Cerritos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Shapiro v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CCDCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Community Development Commission v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.