Legal Opinion

RDI/Caesars Riverboat Casino, Inc. v. Conder

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 2008No. 31A04-0802-CV-40PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Chief Judge.

Here, we must decide whether a riverboat casino that is indefinitely moored to the shore is a “vessel in navigation” for the purpose of the federal Jones Act. 1 We hold that it is not. Appellants-defendants RDI/Caesars Riverboat Casino, Inc., and the M/V Glory of Rome (collectively, Caesars) appeal the trial court’s order granting appellee-plaintiff Tina Conder’s motion for partial summary judgment and denying Caesars’s motion to dismiss Conder’s complaint. Caesars argues that the trial court erred as a matter of law by concluding that an indefinitely moored,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conder v. RDI/Caesars Riverboat Casino, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API