Legal Opinion
Conder v. RDI/Caesars Riverboat Casino, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2009No. 31A01-0907-CV-348PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Tina Conder appeals the trial court's dismissal of her complaint against appellants-defendants RDI/Caesars Riverboat Casino, Inc., and M/V Glory of Rome (collectively, Caesars). Con-der argues that we should reconsider our opinion in the prior appeal in this matter and that the trial court erroneously dismissed her claim against Caesars based on her alleged status as a Sieracki seaman. Declining to reconsider our prior opinion and finding no error in the dismissal of her Sieracki claim, we affirm.
*761FACTS
The underlying facts have already been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conder v. RDI/Caesars Riverboat Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010