Legal Opinion
Polski v. Quigley Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2008No. 07-3350PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Howard and Sheryl Polski (collectively “the Polskis”) brought suit against the Quigley Corporation (“Quigley”), alleging that they suffered severe and permanent impairment of their senses of taste and smell due to their use of Cold-Eeze, a nasal spray made and distributed by Quig-ley for the treatment of cold symptoms. The district court 1 granted Quigley’s motion to exclude the opinion and testimony of the Polskis’ sole causation expert. The court then granted Quigley’s motion for summary judgment. The Polskis appeal the court’s decision excluding the expert testimony…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Hervey v. County of KoochichingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Sappington v. Skyjack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Scott Johnson v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Anthony KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Academy Bank, N.A. v. Amguard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
- Peters v. Woodbury CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.