Blasingame v. Krueger
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNON, Justice.
This mandamus concerns an order by Respondent Krueger granting the real party in interest’s Motion to Quash in an eminent domain proceeding.
The relevant procedural facts are as follows:
On January 17, 1990, the real party in interest, the State of Texas, filed a Petition for Condemnation against relators, George and LaVerne Blasingame, in the County Court of Law of Washington County.
On February 6, 1990, respondent, the Honorable Robert Pieratt, appointed special commissioners pursuant to Tex.Prop. Code Ann. § 21.014(a) (Vernon 1984).
On March 15, 1990, the special…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Amason v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Appraisal Review Board of Harris County Appraisal District v. O'Connor & Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Gulf Energy Pipeline Co. v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
- State v. PR Investments & Specialty Retailers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Circle X Land & Cattle Co. v. Mumford Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- In Re State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.