Legal Opinion

Easley v. McClinton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

. Appeal from Grimes. Tried below before the Hon. Hat. Hart Davis. The opinion of tlie court discloses the material facts.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

The appellees commenced suit in the district court on the twenty-ninth of December, 1859, seeking to recover from the appellant the sum of $1183 62, the amount found due by the Probate Court oí Marengo county, Ala., at the August term for the year 1856, against Benjamin A. Easley, as the administrator of Robert P. MeClinton’s estate, and the appellant and Wm. McClinton as his sureties. Suit was brought on a record of what was claimed to be a valid judgment of said probate court against the parties. The proceedings lingered in the district court until *295the first of June,' 1869, when the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rape v. HeatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Aldrich v. KinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  3. Buckles v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
  4. Noyes v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Wood v. WatkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glenn v. Dallas County Bois D'Arc Island Levee Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Wren v. HowlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Free v. Burgess & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Sowers v. YeomanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Moorhead v. Transportation Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API