Buckles v. Lambert
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASH 33 — PETITION ORDINARY cited 3 ilia?-., 337; 16 B. Mon., 356; 4 J. J. Mar., 269; 4 Litt., 134; 3 Mon., 137; 1 J. J. Mar., 198; Civil Code, sec. 399. cited 3 Mar., 337; 16 B. Mon., 356; 4 J. J. Mar., 269; 4 Litt., 134; 3 Mon., 137; 1 J. J. Mar., 198. C. G. Wintersmith, for appellee, cited Civil Code, secs. 347, 398; 17 B. Mon., 188; Fleety vs. Bell, Mss. Opin., December, 1855.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE BULLITT
delivered the opinion op the court: (Judge Williams dissenting.)'
Lambert sued Ambrose Buckles and the appellants, John and James Buckles, for an assault and battery. They filed separate answers. The jury found a joint verdict against them for $825, and a judgment was entered accordingly. On the same day the defendants moved for a new trial, which was granted to Ambrose, because he was an infant and no guardian ad litem had been appointed for him, and refused to John and James, against whom the judgment was allowed to stand for the sum named in the verdict. To reverse that…
2Cited by43 opinions
- Brown Hotel Co. v. Pittsburgh Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Harshey v. BlackmarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Rape v. HeatonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Peabody v. HamiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Alexander v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.