Legal Opinion

State v. Gravitt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 29, 2008No. A07A2498PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Appealing from the grant of Mickey Gravitt’s and Christina Croy’s motions to suppress evidence found during a search of Croy’s Fayette County home, the state argues that the trial court erred when it refused to allow the state to present additional evidence at a second hearing and when it granted the motions. We find no error and affirm.

When reviewing a trial court’s order on a motion to suppress, where some facts are contested and some are not, this Court views the contested facts under the clearly erroneous standard, while review of the application of law to the uncontested…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Espinoza v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  5. Landers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. State v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. State v. DriggersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Wolf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API