Bogdanski v. Budzik
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
HILL, Justice,
concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which KAUTZ, J., joins.
[¶39] I concur with the majority opinion’s adoption of the McHajfie Rule and the opinion’s disposition of Mr. Bogdanski’s negligent training claim against FedEx. I disagree, however, that triable issues of fact preclude summary judgment on Mr. Bogdanski’s vicarious liability claim against FedEx, and I therefore respectfully dissent from the reversal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment.
[¶40] My disagreement with the majority opinion stems from my view of how a movant must meet its initial summary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Savant Homes, Inc. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- DeWald v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Downen v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.