Legal Opinion

Carden v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1986No. 81824PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought suit in Wayne Circuit Court against defendant corporation, alleging breach of contract and race and handicap discrimination after not having been hired for two different positions. A jury returned a unanimous verdict of no cause of action in favor of the defendant, which now appeals by leave granted from the trial court’s order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff, who is black and stutters severely, applied for an apprenticeship with defendant on June 21, 1978, and asked to be considered for three trades; electrician, millwright and machine repair. He…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Clark v. Uniroyal Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. May v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Wardlow v. Great Lakes Express Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Comiskey v. Automotive Industry Action GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  2. Cox v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
  3. United States Ex Rel. Diop v. Wayne County Community College DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Crittenden v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. DeBiasi v. Charter County of WayneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API