Legal Opinion

Crittenden v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1989No. Docket 103880PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the September 25, 1987, order of the Wayne Circuit Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition and dismissed plaintiff’s claim for handicap discrimination. We reverse.

During plaintiff’s employ with defendant, which began in 1953, he was involved with the United Auto Workers, serving as a union steward and committeeman for several years. In October of 1974, plaintiff was granted a leave of absence to work full-time with the International uaw. His position was funded through a ceta program and entailed job training and placement services for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. QuintanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rancour v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Peterfish v. FrantzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Providence Hospital v. National Labor Union Health & Welfare FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chmielewski v. Xermac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mayberry v. Von ValtierDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Sherman v. Optical Imaging Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  4. Fritz v. Mascotech Automotive Systems Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  5. Collins v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API