Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp. v. Sweeney
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 16, 1993No. 90-09754; CA A68897PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Employer seeks reconsideration and clarification of our opinion, 115 Or App 506, 839 P2d 254 (1992). We grant the motion, modify our opinion and adhere to it as modified.
In our earlier opinion, we concluded that the amount of unscheduled permanent partial disability (PPD) awarded to claimant by determination order could be reduced after claimant completed his vocational rehabilitation training program. We said:
“We conclude that, when an employer chooses the alternative of re-evaluation under ORS 656.268(5), rather than submitting the claim for redetermination, it must follow normal procedures…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- SAIF Corp. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Fox v. Ross Bros.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Holdren v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003