Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Kirkman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1981No. 131PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Justice.

I

The facts involved in this controversy are simple: Counsel for the widow in proceedings establishing her right to dissent from her husband’s will filed petitions requesting that their fees resulting from the litigation be taxed as costs to the estate of the testator. The clerk allowed the requests and was affirmed by the trial court which concluded, “as a matter of law that a proceeding to determine the right of dissent from a will by a surviving spouse is a proceeding within the meaning of North Carolina General Statutes 6-21(2), such matter being a proceeding which fixes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Campbell v. First Baptist Church of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alberti v. Manufactured Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Loeb v. LoebCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. In Re Estate of TucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. In Re the Appeal of Bass Income FundCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API