Loutts v. Loutts
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Eer CURIAM.
Defendant appeals as of right a judgment of divorce following a bench trial'. Because the trial court failed to address defendant’s request for attorney and expert fees pursuant to MCR 3.206(C)(2)(a), erred by determining as a matter of law that the value of a business cannot be used for purposes of both property division and spousal support, abused its discretion by imputing to defendant an income of $40,000 for the purpose of determining spousal support, appropriately imposed a restriction prohibiting defendant from competing with the business that the trial court awarded to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Polkton Charter Township v. PellegromMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Woodington v. ShokoohiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Myland v. MylandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Gonzalez v. St John Hospital & Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Baynesan v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- Nathan v. Libra (In re Libra)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Brody v. Deutchman (In Re Rhea Brody Living Trust)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Great Lakes Shores, Inc. v. BartleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.