Legal Opinion

Loutts v. Loutts

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2012No. Docket No. 297427PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eer CURIAM.

Defendant appeals as of right a judgment of divorce following a bench trial'. Because the trial court failed to address defendant’s request for attorney and expert fees pursuant to MCR 3.206(C)(2)(a), erred by determining as a matter of law that the value of a business cannot be used for purposes of both property division and spousal support, abused its discretion by imputing to defendant an income of $40,000 for the purpose of determining spousal support, appropriately imposed a restriction prohibiting defendant from competing with the business that the trial court awarded to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Polkton Charter Township v. PellegromMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Woodington v. ShokoohiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Myland v. MylandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. St John Hospital & Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Baynesan v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Nathan v. Libra (In re Libra)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  4. Brody v. Deutchman (In Re Rhea Brody Living Trust)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Great Lakes Shores, Inc. v. BartleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API