Seaton Insurance Company v. Clearwater Insurance Company
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge.
I.Introduction
The narrow issue before this Court is whether abstention is appropriate because a related case, first-filed by Defendant Clearwater Insurance Co. (“Clearwater” or “Defendant”) against Plaintiffs Seaton Insurance Co. and Stonewall Insurance Co. (“Seaton” and “Stonewall” or collectively “Plaintiffs”) regarding two reinsurance agreements, is stayed in Connecticut Superior Court. Defendant moves to dismiss or stay Plaintiffs’ claims in this Court, arguing for abstention. The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Lincoln…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rio Grande Community Health Center, Inc. v. RullanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Massachusetts Biologic Laboratories of the University of Massachusetts v. MedImmune, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., as Trustee v. Jennifer L. PikeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Charles Anderson and Merrimack CollegeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026
- Scottsdale Insurance Company v. MRH Indian Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020