Andalex Resources, Inc. v. Mine Safety & Health Administration
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Andalex Resources, Inc. 1 petitions for review of the Mine Safety, and Health Administration’s (MSHA) decision to revoke previously granted modifications to the application of certain mine safety regulations. Andalex contends that MSHA lacked substantial evidence to revoke the modifications and that MSHA abused its discretion in how it applied the standard for revocation. We discern no error in the agency’s decision. Exercising jurisdiction under 30 U.S.C. § 811(d), we deny the petitions for review.
BACKGROUND
A. Underground mine safety regulations and Andalex’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ronald Buckler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- BNSF Railway Co. v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Zen Magnets, LLC v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Rosebud Mining Co. v. Mine Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Canyon Fuel Company v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.