Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation Union
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 19, 1996No. Civil Action 95-5228PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BARTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) has brought this action against certain labor unions and their leaders for instituting and threátening strikes or work stoppages over “minor disputes” in violation of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188. Conrail prays for declaratory and in-junctive relief. It also seeks damages it allegedly incurred in connection with the strike of June 8,1995.
Before the court is the renewed motion of defendants Jack Arnold (“Arnold”), United Transportation Union Local 1418 (“Local 1418), and Ron Souders (“Souders”)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Despain v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013