Legal Opinion
Smith v. Ferro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 22, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: On this appeal in this medical malpractice action plaintiffs claim that defendant hospital’s motion for summary judgment should not have been granted since they have not yet engaged in any discovery to determine the extent of the hospital’s involvement in a prenatal amniocentesis performed at the hospital by defendant, Dr. Philip Ferro. This surgical procedure forms the basis of the malpractice claim. In support of its motion the hospital alleged that the amniocentesis was performed solely by Dr. Ferro who is a physician in private…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Toth v. Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Kimball v. ScorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Lerner Stores Corp. v. Parklane Hosiery Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Paul Tausig & Son, Inc. v. Providence Washington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Raschel v. RishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Moxon v. BarbourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Ford v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987