Legal Opinion

Paul Tausig & Son, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.

The defendant in this action, on a fidelity bond, resists summary judgment. The basic ground for such resistance is that the facts are exclusively within the knowledge of plaintiff and, in such circumstances the courts do not grant summary judgment. (Franklin Nat. Bank of Long Is. v. De Giacomo, 20 A D 2d 797.)

However, that is not to say that summary judgment will not be granted where the defendant makes no reasonable attempt to ascertain the facts, refuses to look for what can be seen and closes its eyes to what is evident. (Overseas Reliance Tours & Travel Serv. v. Sarne Co., 17 A D 2d 578.)

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meath v. MishrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Fine Arts Enterprises v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Lo Breglio v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Cadle Co. v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Hartwig v. Three F. Conservation Society, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API