Legal Opinion
Hoover v. Timken Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 26, 2002No. 01-3905PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Raymond Hoover, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his employment discrimination action construed as filed pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12201 et seq. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).
In a complaint filed May 4, 2001, Hoover sued his employer for discriminating against him on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McNamara v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
- Simpson v. United Auto Workers Local 6000District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Waller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Bradley, Jr. v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, a foreign corporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Bridgeman v. City of Bedford HeightsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.