Waller v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment filed on March 16, 2005. The motion has been fully briefed. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ papers and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved on the briefs submitted. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dawson v. United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters (Local 189)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022