Legal Opinion

Spath v. Sereda

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1969No. 112PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

A motion for a new trial must be made and heard within a period of two months after the verdict is rendered unless the court by order made before its expiration extends such time for cause. Sec. 270.49 (1), Stats. The special verdict was returned on December 6,1967. The motions after verdict were argued on January 22, 1968, on which day the trial judge extended the time sua sponte for decision until March 18, 1968. On this date the court again extended the time for decision until May 7, 1968. Each order recited the extension was “for good cause” but neither set forth the cause and thus did…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Loomans v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fontaine v. FontaineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Pruss v. StrubeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Lawver v. City of Park FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jos. P. Jansen Co. v. Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. DeGroff v. SchmudeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Tuschel v. HaaschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Knox v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API