Legal Opinion

Maeda v. Amemiya

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1979No. 6081PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, Alvin H. Maeda, Edward Lee and Clark S. Toguchi, filed an action for declaratory judgment in circuit court against Ronald Amemiya, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, and Christopher Cobb, Director of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources (appellees), seeking to declare Hawaii Revised Statutes § 188-45 (1974) unconstitutional as violative of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution, and sections 2 and 4, article I of the Hawaii State Constitution. Castle & Cooke, Inc., dba Hawaiian Tuna Packers, a Hawaii…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Applications of Herrick and IrishHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BlossHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. SturchHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Nagle v. Board of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Paul v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP., STATEHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API