Legal Opinion

Claycomb v. Caronna

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 1952No. Civ. 4506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action on August 14, 1951, against defendants who then resided in Los Angeles County. The complaint concerns a transaction between plaintiffs and defendants, who were all at that time residing in San Diego County. Plaintiffs agreed to and did purchase from defendants a 2%-aere piece of property. The sale was completed on May 2, 1946.

In count one plaintiffs allege that defendants became indebted to plaintiffs for money had and received for the use and benefit of plaintiffs in the sum of $7,000; that said sum is due and unpaid and that defendants refuse to pay it.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erwin v. Cee-Tee Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Holstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Rosen v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Thielen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API