Legal Opinion
Thielen v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 12, 1963No. Civ. 27374PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to vacate its order granting motion for change of the place of trial.
The action was brought in Los Angeles County by petitioner against Oakley Ventures, a corporation, Jules Oakley, and Title Insurance & Trust Company. Motion for change of venue to Santa Barbara County was made by Oakley Ventures and Jules Oakley on the ground that the action is “for the recovery of an interest or estate in real property, for the quieting of title to, and for the determination of a right or interest in real property ...”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brown v. Happy Valley Fruit Growers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Eckstrand v. WilshusenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Nelson v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Massae v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- All-Cool Aluminum Awning Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964