United States v. Harold Wasserman, Car-Mar Enterprises, Inc., and Abraham Linet, D/B/A Ultima Sales Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
After a jury trial, appellants were convicted of violations of the federal statute prohibiting mailing of obscene material, 18 U.S.C. § 1461. The issues presented by this appeal may be summarized :(1) Under United States v. Thevis, 484 F.2d 1149 (CA5, 1973), cert. denied, 418 U.S. 932, 94 S.Ct. 3222, 41 L.Ed.2d 1170 (1974), and the requirements of the due process clause, did the District Court err in applying the obscenity standards of Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973), in a trial for allegedly criminal acts which occurred before…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Sherpix, Inc., United States of America v. Louis K. SherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ruth A. Linetsky, Lionel Perry and Linetsky Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Hyman C. Slepicoff, D/B/A Graduate EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.