Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruth A. Linetsky, Lionel Perry and Linetsky Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1976No. 75-3009PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

A jury in the Middle District of Florida found three California residents, Ruth A. Linetsky, Lionel Perry, and Linetsky Products, Inc., guilty under 25 counts of an indictment charging use of the mails to send into the Middle District of Florida “obscene, lewd, lascivious, indecent, filthy, and vile” advertisements and films, in violation of Title 18, United States. Code, § 1461 and § 2. We affirm on 23 counts, reverse on two counts.

The central issue before us concerns the effect in this case of an earlier ruling by the United States District Court for the Central…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bobby Hardwick v. Ollie Doolittle, Jailer and William Anderson, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Carlos SimonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. George Raymond WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API