Legal Opinion

Sheehan v. Marston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1882PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

This is a trustee process. The alleged trustee has answered that he made a contract with Marston, the principal defendant, to furnish certain materials and perform certain work for him for the sum of $100; that Marston has fulfilled said contract, and that therefore he owes him that sum. Leonard C. Fuller appeared as claimant, and offered evidence to show that Marston was his foreman, working for wages for him during all the time this work was done, and that he also furnished the materials with which Marston worked. He further offered to show that Marston communicated to him the fact that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Life Insurance v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. SydemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Lunn & Sweet Co. v. WolfmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. S. S. Pierce Co. v. FiskeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Hubbard v. LamburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Seward v. ArmsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API