Legal Opinion
Morris v. Ernest
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided January 8, 2002No. Civil No. 452/1998 Consolidated with, Civil No. 691/2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHodge, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(January 8, 2002)
Before the Court are Kenneth and Corlette Morris’ (“Morrises”) motion for partial summary judgment against Timothy Earnest and The Bank of Nova Scotia’s (“Bank”) motion for summary judgment against Cecil Penn, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the. reasons set forth below, the Morrises’ motion shall be GRANTED and the Bank’s motion shall be GRANTED IN PART.
*155I. FACTS
This consolidated action involves a number of claims arising out of a real property transaction related to the sale of Parcel 1A-9-1 Estate Dorothea, No. 7A Little…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Isidor Paiewonsky Associates, Inc. v. Sharp Properties, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1991
- Royal Bank of Canada v. ClarkeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1974
- Board of Directors of Shibui Condominium Ass'n v. Consolidated International, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1993
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. MillerSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ernest v. MorrisSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016