Legal Opinion

Chad Kenyatta Leigh v. Labor Finders and James D. Moore

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 18, 2026No. 6:25-cv-01238Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CHAD KENYATTA LEIGH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-1238-AJP-BGS LABOR FINDERS, and JAMES D. MOORE Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Chad Kenyatta Leigh, proceeding pro se, brings a claim for employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against Defendants Labor Finders and James D. Moore. Before the Court are two Motions to Dismiss filed by both Defendants (Docs. 8, 14) and a Motion for Order filed by the Plaintiff (Doc. 22). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Defendants’ first Motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API