Legal Opinion

McGinn v. Kimmel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1950No. 31384PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The respondent brought this action against appellants to recover damages arising out of the death of her husband. The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellants. Respondent moved for a new trial, which the court granted by a general order.

Francis X. McGinn, the deceased, was driving his automobile in a westerly direction on a public highway. John F. Kimmel was driving an automobile belonging to his father, George L. Kimmel, in an easterly direction on the same highway. The two automobiles collided, causing the death of decedent. This action was based upon the negligence of John F. Kimmel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Carlson v. WolskiWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Henry v. LarsenWashington Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cameron v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. Bell v. WestWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cole v. FairchildWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Nawrocki v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API