Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Wolski

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1944No. 29232PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jeffers, J. —

This action was instituted by Antone S. Carlson and wife against Ed Wolski and wife and their grandson, David E. Pugh, to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by Carrie Carlson as the result of being struck by an automobile owned by defendants Wolski and wife, but being driven at the time of the accident by defendant Pugh.

Defendants by their answer admit and deny certain allegations of the complaint, and then set up two affirmative defenses. In view of the statement of points to be relied upon by appellants on this appeal, it will be necessary to refer only to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hart v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Cook v. RaffertyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Buss v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Krisher v. DuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Burkhart v. CornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McGinn v. KimmelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hanford v. GoehryWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Callen v. Coca Cola Bottling, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API