Legal Opinion
Wolfe v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 14, 1944No. 30983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, V. C. J.
This is an action in ejectment and to recover damages. The trial court directed verdict for plaintiff, and entered judgment against defendant for possession and damages, and he ap- • peals.
On March 31, 1931, the Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company obtained a money judgment against plaintiff Smith in the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, and on April 4, 1931, filed an abstract or transcript thereof in the office of the clerk of the district court of said county, in the manner provided by law, in order to establish a judgment lien on the real estate belonging to Smith. Sections…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garnett v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Rahm v. SoperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Price v. BanesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Paley v. SolomonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1945
- Hylton v. City of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Halperin v. CohenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949