Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1975No. 2333PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

This appeal involves the authority of a superior court judge to modify a divorce decree. It is contended that no motion to modify the decree was properly before the judge; that the modification was made without affording Mrs. Johnson an opportunity to be heard in violation of her constitutional due process rights; and that the court lacked jurisdiction to modify the trust provisions contained in the original decree. It is also alleged that the trial court erred in its modification of the decree by appointing a guardian ad litem and trustee, finding that a transfer of…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Flores v. FloresAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Carvalho v. CarvalhoAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Williams v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gallant v. GallantAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API