Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1DissentMosk, J.
I dissent. The question is whether despite Labor Code section 4661 the employer may reduce this longshore worker’s state-mandated *93permanent disability indemnity simply because his federally required temporary disability indemnity exceeded the amount available under state law. By allowing such a reduction in violation of section 4661 the majority upset the balance of distinct economic interests embodied in California workers’ compensation law.
Chris A. Lopez, a harbor worker at the Port of Oakland, injured his shoulder while lifting a heavy box overhead. The injury rendered him 20 V2 percent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sun Ship, Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. ValladoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.