Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1996No. S042327Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent. The question is whether despite Labor Code section 4661 the employer may reduce this longshore worker’s state-mandated *93permanent disability indemnity simply because his federally required temporary disability indemnity exceeded the amount available under state law. By allowing such a reduction in violation of section 4661 the majority upset the balance of distinct economic interests embodied in California workers’ compensation law.

Chris A. Lopez, a harbor worker at the Port of Oakland, injured his shoulder while lifting a heavy box overhead. The injury rendered him 20 V2 percent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Sun Ship, Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. ValladoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API