Commonwealth v. Considine
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
We consider in this case whether private school officials are agents of the State and thus bound by the constitu*296tional prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. The question arises in the context of motions to suppress. The three defendants — Keith Considine, Caleb Tripp, and Jeffrey Rogers — were charged in the Northern Berkshire Division of the District Court Department with one count each of possession of a class B substance, possession of a class D substance, and being a minor in possession of alcohol. Each filed a motion to suppress evidence found in the hotel room in which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MavredakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Driscoll v. Board of TrusteesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. Porter P.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.