Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 9, 2015No. SJC 11624PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of murder in the second degree in the death by shooting of fourteen year old Marvin Constant. At the time of his arrest for the shooting, the defendant was seventeen years and five months old. The Commonwealth’s evidence at trial included, among other things, incriminating statements that the defendant made to police after waiving his Miranda rights. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). The defendant sought, unsuccessfully, to suppress these statements. He argues on appeal that their introduction at trial was error given our common-law rule…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. MavredakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. AdjutantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. NevesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. ColtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  5. COMMONWEALTH v. STANLEY S., a juvenile.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API