Legal Opinion

Matos Rodriguez v. Pan American Health Organization

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 9, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-0928Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RAMONA MATOS RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-928 (JEB) PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Most public attention on human trafficking and forced labor understandably focuses on destitute victims who live on the margins of society. In this case, however, those allegedly taken advantage of were Cuban physicians, who assert that their government, through threats and intimidation, coerced them into providing medical services in Brazil, restricted their movement and contacts while…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API