Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Redmond

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 18, 2001No. 00-P-408PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

A jury found the defendant guilty of wilful and malicious destruction of property over $250 (G. L. c. 266, § 127), possession of burglarious instruments (G. L. c. 266, § 49), and breaking and entering in the nighttime with the intent to commit a felony (G. L. c. 266, § 16). On appeal, he contends that the trial judge erred (1) in denying his motion for a required finding of not guilty on the indictment charging wilful and malicious destruction of property; (2) in instructing the jury on possession of burglarious instruments and responding to a jury question; and (3) in giving a supplemental…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Da Silva Neto v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. CostaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. PetersenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. CottoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API