Commonwealth v. Redmond
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.
A jury found the defendant guilty of wilful and malicious destruction of property over $250 (G. L. c. 266, § 127), possession of burglarious instruments (G. L. c. 266, § 49), and breaking and entering in the nighttime with the intent to commit a felony (G. L. c. 266, § 16). On appeal, he contends that the trial judge erred (1) in denying his motion for a required finding of not guilty on the indictment charging wilful and malicious destruction of property; (2) in instructing the jury on possession of burglarious instruments and responding to a jury question; and (3) in giving a supplemental…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Da Silva Neto v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Commonwealth v. CostaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. PetersenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. CottoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.