Legal Opinion

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6351, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8805 Carlos Renan-Perez Canales v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1998No. 97-55171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

151 F.3d 1226

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6351, 98 Daily Journal

D.A.R. 8805

Carlos Renan-Perez CANALES, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Ernest C. ROE, Warden; Attorney General of the State of

California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 97-55171.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 9, 1998.

Decided Aug. 14, 1998.

Octavio A. Pedroza (argued) and James M. Harris, Sidley & Austin, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner-appellant.

Carole W. Pollack and Carl N. Henry, Deputy Attorneys General, Los Angeles, California, for respondents-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API