Sherwood v. Ahart
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. D. Arnot, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was to enjoin defendant from interfering with the free use and occupation of a certain highway by plaintiffs, and from interfering with or preventing plaintiffs, or either of them, from entering upon any portion of said way and repairing the same. The theory upon which the action was tried is that said way constitutes a public highway and that said plaintiffs were especially damaged by reason of the interference on the part of the defendant with the use and enjoyment of the same on the part of the former. There is, however, no allegation in the complaint that said way constitutes a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Leverone v. WeakleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hartley v. VermillionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Meek v. De LatourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lantz v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- St. John v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- County of Riverside v. LeslieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Friends of the Hastain Trail v. Coldwater Development LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.