Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Vermillion

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1903No. Sac. No. 951PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County and from an order denying a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DYKE, J.—

This action was brought to declare a strip of land running north a mile and a quarter to a mile and a half from the county road in Solano County, commonly called the E. R. Thurber road, to the south line of defendant Vermillion’s so-called home place, a public highway, and to restrain defendants from obstructing the same. The answer denied that the so-called road or highway was a public road or highway, but averred that the same was a private road, the property of the defendants, in which the general public had no interest whatever. The court found in favor of the plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Sherman v. BuickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Cooper v. Monterey CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Ball v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Leverone v. WeakleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API