Legal Opinion
Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0335PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Araya Henok brings this action against Chase Home Finance, LLC (“Chase”), Shapiro & Burson, LLP, Fannie Mae, and Dorothy Ihuoma, challenging the legality of the foreclosure on a property he owned on Myrtle Avenue N.E. in Washington, D.C. (“the property”). Ihuoma purchased the property after the foreclosure sale, and moves to dismiss the complaint against her under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to allege a cause of action against her. Because Henok has failed to plead facts showing any wrongdoing by Ihuoma or…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cardenas v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McMullen v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Charles v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Mohammed v. CooperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Taylor v. Clark Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022