Legal Opinion

Davis v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1928No. 18744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Under the provisions of section 5183 of the Civil Code, requiring that a petition for certiorari “shall plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of,” a mere general averment of error, in connection *668with which there is no statement or assignment whatever as to how or wherein the rulings complained of were erroneous, presents no case or question for decision by the judge of the superior court. Edgeman v. Stewart, 141 Ga. 686 (81 S. E. 1036); Citizens Banking Co. v. Parris, 119 Ga. 517 (46 S. E. 638); Smith v. Marshall, 127 Ga. 374 (56 S. E. 416); Harrell v. Quitman, 17 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Citizens Banking Co. v. ParisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Smith v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Chan v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Harrell v. City of QuitmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Edgeman v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wood v. Fairfax Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API