Legal Opinion

Smith v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Practice in. the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

The principle stated in the headnote has been announced in numerous decisions of this court. The Civil Code, g 5527, provides, that “either par-ty in any civil cause, and the defendant in any criminal proceeding, in the superior courts of this State, may except to any sentence, judgment, or decision, or decree of such court, or of the judge thereof,' in any matter heard at chambers. Such bill of exceptions shall specify plainly the decision complained of, and the alleged error, and shall be signed by the party, or his attorney or solicitor.” And section 4637 provides that “when either party,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens Banking Co. v. ParisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Wheeler v. WorleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Peavy v. Atkinson Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wade v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Greenfield v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Stewart v. Marietta Trust & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Taylor v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Edgeman v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API