Allen v. Line
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.
It is the claim of the plaintiff that this is an action for -money had. and received. Plaintiff in his amended complaint- alleges that he purchased from defendant 1,285 lambs; that “defendant agreed to feed and sell said lambs for the use of the plaintiff”; and that defendant owes a balance of $7,394 to the plaintiff as a result of the transaction. By his answer defendant alleges that he fully performed his part of the agreement and counterclaimed for $2,701.48. On motion of the defendant and after waiver of the counterclaim, the court directed a verdict and entered judgment dismissing the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tanderup v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Goldberg v. Sisseton Loan & Title Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Yeager v. South Dakota Central Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Fryer v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rensch v. Riddle's Diamonds of Rapid City, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Pearson v. AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- JOS. H. REINFELD v. Griswold & Bateman Whs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Soby Construction, Inc. v. Skjonsby Truck Line, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.