Legal Opinion
Fryer v. Cooper
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 1928No. File No. 6091PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, P. J.
In the spring and summer of 1923 plaintiff was the owner of a Perdieron stallion. 'Defendant, desiring the services of a stallion, contracted with plaintiff to take, feed, and care for said stallion during the year 1923. The exact terms of the contract are in dispute. Plaintiff claims he was- to have an equal division of a $12 service fee for each colt begotten, and that *288defendant was to care for the horse in the usual manner. Defendant claims he was to- pay nothing for colts from his own mares, but 'was to divide equally fees for colts from other mares, and that he was to have the use of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swift v. MoseleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
- Charles Towne & Co. v. WileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- McCurdy v. Wallblom Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Crocker v. GulliferSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
- Palmer v. MayoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allen v. LineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Higbee Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- United States Fire Insurance v. Paramount Fur Service, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957