Legal Opinion

Rensch v. Riddle's Diamonds of Rapid City, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1986No. 15142PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Appeal from trial court’s finding of conversion, award of damages and prejudgment interest. We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand.

Statement of Facts

On October 28,1982, appellee William M. Rensch (Rensch), left two diamond rings to be cleaned with appellant Riddle’s Keepsake Diamond Center (Riddle’s) at the Rushmore Mall in Rapid City, South Dako*270ta. At that time, Riddle’s was advertising free ring cleaning to the public. When Rensch returned later that same day to pick up his rings, he learned that Riddle’s clerk had mistakenly given them to another customer. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Windeler v. Scheers JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Allred v. HinkleyUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Bader v. CerriNevada Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Mash v. CutlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Denke v. MamolaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API