People v. Bergen
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Judge TAUBMAN
dissenting.
Because I respectfully disagree with the majority’s construction of the grand jury statute, its upholding the constitutionality of the dogfighting statute, and its assessment of prosecutorial misconduct, I dissent.
I. Interpretation of the Grand Jury Statute
The majority concludes that Bergen waived her rights under the grand jury statute and thus was not entitled to the prosecu-torial immunity it affords. I disagree with both that conclusion and the majority’s interpretation of the statute.
The majority’s interpretation rests on the premise that the statute is clear and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.