Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Bergen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1994No. 91CA1629Published

1Dissent

Judge TAUBMAN

dissenting.

Because I respectfully disagree with the majority’s construction of the grand jury statute, its upholding the constitutionality of the dogfighting statute, and its assessment of prosecutorial misconduct, I dissent.

I. Interpretation of the Grand Jury Statute

The majority concludes that Bergen waived her rights under the grand jury statute and thus was not entitled to the prosecu-torial immunity it affords. I disagree with both that conclusion and the majority’s interpretation of the statute.

The majority’s interpretation rests on the premise that the statute is clear and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API